Share this page on facebook
Port Washington


Council poised to ink deal for first marina district project PDF Print E-mail
Community
Written by Kristyn Halbig Ziehm   
Wednesday, 10 May 2017 20:58

Agreement would clear way for condos on car-trailer lot being sold by city

The Port Washington Common Council is expected to consider next week a developer’s agreement that will outline the remaining conditions architect Stephen Perry Smith needs to meet in order to build 11 condominium units on the city-owned car-trailer parking lot at the east end of Washington Street.

If the agreement and ultimate sale of the parking lot are approved, Smith’s townhouse development would become the first marina district proposal to be constructed.

Aldermen were originally expected to review the agreement at their May 2 meeting, but because the document wasn’t completed until shortly before the meeting, officials tabled the matter until the council’s May 16 meeting.

“We really need more time to look at it,” City Administrator Mark Grams told aldermen. “I don’t want to rush you into making a decision.”

Smith’s offer to purchase the property, which was accepted by the Common Council last month, called for the developer’s agreement to be approved by May 3, unless both sides approved another date. Aldermen agreed to postpone the date, but did not specify a new one.

Since last week’s meeting, officials have been working to amend the proposed developer’s agreement, Grams said.

That’s due in large part to the fact that the city, which had initially intended to move two sewer mains off the property, is now planning to keep one on the parcel but move the other.

Much of the developer’s agreement deals with the utility work, Grams noted.

The city’s engineering firm has determined the cost of moving a force main that crosses the parking lot into Lake Street is more difficult than expected, Grams said.  Consequently, it would cost the city about twice as much as expected.

The current plan is to keep the force main on the parking lot, moving it slightly to accommodate Smith’s design, and place an easement over it.

A gravity sewer on the property would still be moved out of the parking lot, Grams said.

The original estimate to move both sewer lines was between $250,000 and $300,000, Grams said. The change would bring the cost to about $200,000.

Grams said Tuesday that the city hopes to get bids for the utility work in time for council approval on June 6. 

Officials hope the sewer work will be completed in July, Grams said, adding that the sale of the parking lot to Smith will be finalized shortly after that.

Smith, who is not seeking incentives from the city for his project, will pay $140,000 for the car-trailer parking lot. Grams said the proposed agreement calls for Smith to begin construction of his project within six months after purchasing the property. If he doesn’t, the city has the option of buying the property back. 

In addition to moving the sewer lines, the city is to remediate the site so Smith’s buildings can be constructed there.

Grams noted that the remediation is expected to be minimal since the townhouses won’t have basements.

“We won’t know exactly how much it will be until he submits his foundation plan,” Grams said.

Amy Otis-Wilborn, 233 E. Pier St., told aldermen last week that she believes the city should not pay to have the sewer lines moved but instead pass the cost on to Smith.

“What about the developer taking on that cost?” she asked. “It’s a low price. It’s a prime piece of property.”

Smith told aldermen last week that he is comfortable delaying approval of the developer’s agreement until May 16, noting he is fine with the document.

However, he asked aldermen to also extend the June 16 closing date for the purchase.

“We need the approved developer’s agreement as part of our financing,” he said, adding a delay in signing the agreement could cause a financing delay.

 
Mayor bristles at questions about tabled ordinance PDF Print E-mail
Community
Written by Kristyn Halbig Ziehm   
Wednesday, 03 May 2017 20:20

He calls motivation for questions about board appointments ‘disgusting’

It was expected to be a simple matter before the Common Council Tuesday — an initial review of a proposed ordinance change that was to be tabled until May 16. 

But after a resident questioned the reasons for the change, which dealt with membership on the city’s Design Review Board,  Mayor Tom Mlada became upset at what he characterized as a challenge to his character, saying it was “really disheartening and disgusting to me.”

“I’m tired of it,” he said. “I pour myself into this job.”

If people have questions about his appointments or initiatives, he said, “how about the courtesy of a phone call to ask about it.”

The proposed ordinance change would define the membership of the city’s Design Review Board — the city engineer, a representative of the police or fire department and three people appointed by the mayor. One of those three may live outside the city, the proposed ordinance said, and one could be a citizen of another country.

Kim Haskell, 767 W. Grand Ave., said she was asked by people on her Facebook page to question the ordinance because the language “seemed specific.”

“The concern is was there already someone in mind (to fill the positions),” she said. 

People are worried the mayor may be considering a developer, Haskell said, adding that could constitute a conflict of interest.”

Mlada noted that officials are working on the wording of the proposed ordinance and thus the matter was being tabled. He said it was as a bookkeeping matter caught as the city works to recodify its ordinances.

“I did not design that change with a person in mind,” Mlada said, particularly not a contractor or developer, as people have intimated.

His appointments are always made with the intention of allowing for a broad cross-section of ideas, with an eye for a person’s qualifications, Mlada said.

“To suggest I appoint anyone for any other reason is insulting to me and insulting to them,” he said.

He asked residents and the council for their trust, saying, “After five years, I think I’ve earned it.”

City Attorney Eric Eberhardt noted that the Design Review Board is an advisory body that doesn’t make final decisions on any matter. 

There’s a potential for a conflict of interest, with virtually every member of the city’s committees and boards, he added, and these issues can be dealt with as they arise.

 
Council aims to hone its communication skills PDF Print E-mail
Community
Written by KRISTYN HALBIG ZIEHM   
Wednesday, 26 April 2017 21:04

Port officials to dedicate meeting time to discussing key issues so residents don’t feel left in the dark

For the next year, the Port Washington Common Council will devote a portion of each meeting to discussing the pressing issues facing the community, Mayor Tom Mlada announced last week.

The initiative will look at the community’s needs and the attendant expenses involved in each, he said, explaining this is an effort to give people the background needed as they look at various projects the city is considering.

He framed the topics as “challenges and opportunities” the city is facing and dealing with.

“This is an introduction to the topics,” Mlada said. “It’s meant to be a starting point. It’s a way to invite people into the conversation so they understand the situations we’re facing and the interconnectedness of them all.”

Development issues have split the city in the past year, and Mlada said the sessions will give people the background they need to fully assess these proposals. 

Ald. Doug Biggs said the council  “heard loud and clear” people’s concerns that they want more information about what is happening in the city, and the initiative will address that.

Decisions aren’t likely to be made on the nights when each topic is addressed, he said.

“We believe it’s important to get all that information to the community to make sure we’re all singing out of the same song book,” Biggs said.

Underscoring the effort are several core principles, Mlada said — increasing residential density, attracting strategic retailers and adding attractions that will enhance downtown and draw people there year-round, and preserving and enhancing safe public lakefront access.

“We must drive economic growth within our community to be successful long-term,” he said. 

Mlada noted that the earliest topics involve costs and needs the city needs to address soon, while those later in the year will deal with funding.

“These are conversations we have to have,” Mlada said. 

While people may disagree on the solutions to many of the issues, he added, “they need to understand what we’re facing.”

The topics to be addressed are:

nBreakwater repairs on May 2.

nThe lighthouse preservation efforts on May 16. The city has not yet received ownership of the lighthouse from the federal government, Mlada said, but that is expected to occur soon.

nStreet and sidewalk projects and the pavement and surface evaluation and rating system used to determine their priorities on May 6.

nPolice and fire department needs on June 20.

nIn July, when the council holds only one meeting, capital needs across all city departments will be examined.

“There are capital needs that are going unfulfilled,” Mlada said, adding that the challenge for the city is that “the more we push things down the line, the more expensive they become.”

nMarketing and economic development will be addressed Aug. 1.

nA review of city revenues is slated for Aug. 15.

nA borrowing update will be given on Sept. 5.

nThe city’s tax incremental financing district will be examined on Sept. 19.

nGrowth strategies for the city’s manufacturing and commercial base will be discussed Oct. 13.

nThe city’s economic development plan for 2035 will be reviewed on Oct. 17.

nBudget realities are the subject for the Nov. 7 meeting.

nDowntown redevelopment is slated for the Nov. 21 meeting.

nA year-end review will be held on Dec. 5.

 
Developer ready to move on Cedar Vineyard PDF Print E-mail
Community
Written by KRISTYN HALBIG ZIEHM   
Wednesday, 19 April 2017 21:08

Purchase of Port land for subdivision, vineyard, nature preserve to be completed soon, firm’s president says

Tom Swarthout, president of the Highview Group, said Tuesday he expects to complete the purchase of 227 acres on Port Washington’s far southeast side for the proposed Cedar Vineyard development by mid-May.

“Things are really moving quickly now,” Swarthout said.  “It’s really exciting.”

The engineering work for the subdivision is completed, he said, and funding is in place for the purchase.

“Everybody’s on board,” Swarthout said, adding it has taken a significant amount of coordination to ensure that the purchase of the property — and almost simultaneous sale of 101 acres to Ozaukee County for a nature preserve — can be completed in short order.

The Highview Group is purchasing land off Highway C, land once slated for  a high-intensity subdivision by the VK Development. 

But instead of an intensive use of the land, Swarthout plans to create 82 half-acre lots on the land, with a vineyard planned along Highway C and a winery on the west side of Highway C south of Stonecroft Drive.

A 101-acre nature preserve will also be created that encompasses Cedar Gorge and roughly 150 feet of land along the Lake Michigan bluff. This property will be acquired by the Highview Group and within minutes sold to the Ozaukee Washington Land Trust, which has received grants to cover the $2 million purchase price.

Swarthout said 1,200 grapevines have been ordered for the vineyard. The fact they need to be planted by mid-June has driven the time schedule. 

“We don’t want to lose the season,” he said.

The first vines will be planted on the north end of the subdivision, Swarthout said last year, adding that work on the winery, which will be built using pieces of several old barns the company has acquired, will also begin in earnest this year. 

The winery and vineyard will be run by Steve and Maria Johnson, who own Parallel 44 Vineyard and Winery in Kewaunee and Door 44 Winery in Sturgeon Bay.

Swarthout also said last year that he hopes to begin constructing houses on the land this year,.

Prospective homeowners have already reserved 12 lots in the subdivision, he said Tuesday.

Swarthout said he and his partners are encouraged by the prospective development of 44 acres of city-owned land on the south bluff.

“It brings a little more synergy to the area and validates what we believe is a special property,” he said. “We’re essentially creating a new neighborhood for the city.”

 
Alderman greets election winners with chilly lecture PDF Print E-mail
Community
Written by KRISTYN HALBIG ZIEHM   
Wednesday, 12 April 2017 22:25

Larson says candidates who ousted councilmen took advantage of low turnout in Blues Factory-themed race

Instead of the traditional farewell to fellow aldermen and welcome to incoming officials, Port Washington Ald. Dave Larson used last Wednesday’s Common Council meeting — the day after the April election — to lecture the city’s newest aldermen on their responsibilities.

He singled out aldermen-elect John Sigwart, who defeated incumbent Ald. Dan Becker, the council president, by a vote of 260-98, and Mike Gasper, one of two candidates who ousted incumbent Bill Driscoll in the February primary and who ultimately won the election.

Both Sigwart and Gasper expressed opposition to the proposed Blues Factory development on the city’s lakefront in an election defined by concerns about development.

“I think we all know what issues were behind this election,” Larson added. “If there’s some type of message we’re supposed to be sent here, I don’t see it.

“I think this was a vocal minority that took advantage of a low-turnout election. I think that silent majority is going to become very loud very soon.”

Larson also told the new aldermen, “You’re not one of us. You’re part of this group.”

Larson told Sigwart and Gasper that while they may have won by a substantial margin, they represent all the people in their districts, not just those who oppose development.

“You represent the taxpayers, not the voters,” Larson said.

Sigwart said this week that he was taken aback by Larson’s comments.

“I was disappointed he felt he had to remind me I represent the people of my district. That was insulting,” Sigwart said. “He took a shot across the bow that’s going to be hard to forget.

“I don’t believe what he said was all that terrible, except when he said I was not one of them. I thought that was very bad.”

Gasper said this week that Larson’s comments were “kind of disappointing.”

“It’s not a very welcoming attitude to change on the council,” he said. “You have to roll with it if you’re on the council. There will be different people who come on and you have to work with them.

“If we want to be successful working together, we can’t all hate each other.”

In his speech, Larson also talked about the tone of the campaign, saying some of the rhetoric was “frustrating at best.”

He said he was surprised by the amount of misinformation being circulated, especially at a listening session he attended before the election.

“I couldn’t believe what I was hearing,” Larson said. “I truly believe they are only hearing what they want to hear.”

Much of the correct information is available, reported in Ozaukee Press and elsewhere, he said.

The outgoing aldermen — Bill Driscoll, Dan Becker and Kevin Rudser — were praised for their service by their fellow officials during the meeting, and they offered their own parting thoughts.

Driscoll said his biggest frustration was that throughout his tenure, few people contacted him to discuss their opinions on issues.

“That’s the one thing I would change,” he said. “I don’t know how to do that.”

He said there was one vote he regretted during his years on the council — not the Blues Factory, he emphasized — adding that he believes history will prove that the council’s decision to sell the north marina slip parking lot for the entertainment complex was the right one.

Becker acknowledged the development controversies, particularly the council’s decision to sell a city-owned lakefront parking lot for the Blues Factory, saying, “At the end of the day, it didn’t really matter what business was proposed for that site. They (development opponents) would have opposed anything on that site. What’s being opposed by many is change.”

Addressing the incoming officials, Becker said, “I ask you to be bold and not only look at the needs of the city today but for generations to come. We need to be forward focused.”

While the city has come a long way in recent years, there’s still plenty of work to be done, he said.

“We need development. We need redevelopment of certain sites in the city,” Becker said. “We can’t allow buildings to stay vacant for 20-plus years.”

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 3 of 83
advertisement
Banner
Banner